Wednesday, January 27, 2010

'Heroes will be heroes again...'


Marvel superheroes are leaving the dark side.

After seven years of grim and grimmer story lines, including a superhero "civil war" that pitted Iron Man against Spider-Man and the death of Captain America, Marvel Comics will usher in a more optimistic "Heroic Age" approach in May.

"Heroes will be heroes again," says Marvel editor in chief Joe Quesada. "They've gone through hell and they're back to being good guys — a throwback to the early days of the Marvel Universe, with more of a swashbuckling feel."

The change begins with a relaunch of Avengers #1, which will reunite Iron Man, a reborn Captain America and Thor as comrades rather than foes.

All this would be of interest only to comic fans except it comes just months after Disney purchased Marvel for $4 billion and as Iron Man 2 and other Marvel films are on the way.

It also could mark a major shift in comic book storytelling, which took a turn to grittier stories after the success of DC's The Dark Knight Returns and Marvel's more adult take on Daredevilin the 1980s.

Quesada says that Marvel's return to "good guys" was in the works for two years, was finalized eight months ago and that the Disney takeover had no role.

"There is no sanitizing of the Marvel books at all," he says, promising stories will remain "edgy" and contemporary. "Our philosophy here is to just keep telling good stories."

In the upcoming Avengers' story line, however, the changes will remain in continuity and will not be a "reboot" of the franchises involved.

Likely to give the "Heroic Age" considerable fanboy cred will be the participation of writer Brian Michael Bendis, who was chief architect of the "disassembly" of the Marvel Universe in the first place. Most recently, he has overseen the "Dark Reign" story line where villain Norman Osborn (the Green Goblin) has taken charge of the superhero community. That approach ends with the "Heroic Age."

"The 'brand new day' of the Heroic Age presents a tonal shift to optimism, a world filled with hope but quite hellish villains," Bendis says. "The heroes realize it's a blue-sky world worth protecting."

Bendis says the story line was approved long before the sale to Disney. "This was always the plan, and I have the memos to prove it," he says with a laugh.

"This was always the whole point — the reunion, the Avengers getting back together, because this is what the world needs right now," Bendis says. "Now we get to the good stuff."


By David Colton, USA TODAY
Find this article at:
http://www.usatoday.com/life/comics/2010-01-27-marvel27_ST_N.htm

3 comments:

  1. I guess I don't really have a problem with "Grim" stories since they mirror our own society's concerns. I wouldnt mind reading some stories with an optimistic spin on things either.

    I guess the thing that has really put me off of anything except for the Walking dead or Invincible is just the fact that nothing changes in the Marvel and DC universes. I'm a green lantern fan. I was kinda optimistic when they brought back Hal, but I realized after a few issues, they didnt have any ideas on what to do with the character after the whole "rebirth". I did enjoy the "Corps" spin-off though.

    I don't have a problem with writers taking a character and making them "Their" creation as long as the changes stick and are considered canon. This "it was a dream" or "That happened on another plane of existence" or even the "he came back from the dead/was just knocked out" stuff gets kinda old after a while.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Umm, yeah. I haven't paid the amount of attention to comics like I used to so I am a little behind the "times" but over the last, what, 5-10 yrs, Marvel did a cycle of sorts? The last time I really read them: Spider-Man PP was revealed to be a clone, Capt America was shot on the steps of the Greenville county courthouse, Kyle Rainer rains as GL, Superman still had long hair, Tony left ForceWorks. I am ashamed...

    ReplyDelete